What a decade of one examiner's dispositions actually tells you.
The case against allowance rate as a decision input.
Insights
Notes on prosecution strategy, examiner behavior, and what actually works in front of the USPTO.
AllExaminer behaviorResponse strategyClaim draftingAI in prosecutionProduct
Element-by-element, or nothing.
Why the structure of a response matters more than its prose.
The amendment you did not need to make.
Scope-conscious amendment and the estoppel it costs you.
Reading a 103 rejection like the examiner wrote it.
A working method for prosecution teams.
Why we built a verifier before a chat interface.
An engineering note on filable output.
What the firm's voice actually consists of.
The observable structure of a prosecution style.
Prosecution intelligence, occasionally.
A short note when we publish something worth your time. No product announcements.
Book a demo
Bring us a real Office Action.
Thirty minutes. We'll run one of your actual matters and walk through what NOA found in the record - the examiner's pattern, the ranked options, and the draft.
- The behavioral profile for the examiner on your case
- The ranked response strategies and the signals behind each one
- An element-by-element claim map against the cited art
- A complete draft response, and the verification pass on it