How it works

We didn't build a chatbot for patents

Most legal AI wraps a general model in a nice interface and asks it to be a lawyer. NOA is built the other way around: a structured pipeline where each stage is separately testable, each recommendation is traceable to evidence in the record, and a dedicated verification layer checks the output before you see it.

Layer 1 Record evidence Layer 2 Examiner behavior Layer 3 Response verification NOA reasoning architecture

NOA reasoning architecture

  1. Layer 1Record evidence
  2. Layer 2Examiner behavior
  3. Layer 3Response verification

01

The record is the ground truth

Every profile NOA builds comes from primary source material: the actual file wrappers, the actual Office Actions, the actual outcomes. Nothing is inferred from summaries or scraped secondary databases.

When NOA tells you an examiner responds to a particular argument, that statement is anchored to specific prosecutions you can go read.

02

Behavior, not averages

An allowance rate is a single number describing thousands of different situations. It tells you almost nothing about your case.

NOA models conditional behaviour instead: what has this examiner actually done, on a rejection like this one, at this stage of prosecution? The output is a distribution and a reason, not a headline statistic.

03

Style is a learnable structure

A firm's prosecution voice is not decoration. It's a set of repeated choices: how arguments open, how the record is characterised, how much is conceded, how amendments are framed.

NOA learns those choices from your own prosecution history and reproduces them — inside your tenant, on your data, for your firm only.

04

The verifier is the product

Anyone can generate a document. The hard part is knowing whether it's filable.

NOA scores every draft against an explicit rubric, and flags the specific failure modes that matter in prosecution: assertions without record support, claim language that overreaches the specification, and arguments that create estoppel you didn't intend.

What NOA is not

It is not legal advice. It's a decision-support tool. A licensed practitioner reviews, edits, and signs everything.

It does not predict outcomes with certainty. It estimates likelihoods from historical behavior, and shows you the evidence so you can disagree with it.

It does not replace judgment. It replaces the blank page and the hours of file-wrapper reading nobody has time for.

See the reasoning behind the response

Explore how NOA turns prosecution history into clear, reviewable decisions.