Portfolio view
| Matter | Examiner | Status | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| OA-1842 | A. R. | Respond | |
| OA-2170 | M. K. | Review | |
| OA-2433 | S. L. | Draft | |
| OA-2519 | D. P. | Map | |
| OA-2661 | J. T. | Decide |
For corporate IP teams
The same view of the record your outside counsel has. Sometimes a better one.
NOA gives in-house teams examiner-level intelligence across the whole portfolio — so filing, continuation and appeal decisions rest on the record rather than on whoever is loudest on the call.
Portfolio visibility
Every pending matter, its examiner, its posture and its realistic path, in one view.
Outside counsel oversight
Compare how your firms perform on comparable matters, with comparable examiners, on evidence rather than relationship.
Budget defensibility
Know before you authorise a response whether the strategy matches how this examiner has actually behaved.
Ask better questions on the Monday call.
When a firm recommends an appeal, NOA shows you what this examiner has done with comparable appeals. When a response comes back, you can see whether the argument is one that has historically moved this examiner. It's not a scorecard for punishing counsel — it's shared ground so the conversation is about the case.
| Firm | Response fit | Cycle control | Appeal timing | Record support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firm A | ||||
| Firm B | ||||
| Firm C | ||||
| Firm D | ||||
| Firm E | ||||
| Firm F |
Prosecution spend, connected to prosecution reality.
Fewer wasted response cycles. Earlier decisions to continue, narrow or abandon.
Amendment path
Appeal path
Continuation path
Abandonment timing
Built for a vendor review.
Per-client data isolation, no cross-customer model training, and a documented data-handling boundary. We answer security questionnaires directly.
Encrypted
[COMPLIANCE STATUS — TBC]
Tenant isolated
[COMPLIANCE STATUS — TBC]
Access controlled
[COMPLIANCE STATUS — TBC]
Audit ready
[COMPLIANCE STATUS — TBC]